Legal Opinion

GS Holistic, LLC v. Smoke and Vape

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 21, 2024No. 3:23-cv-00753Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 GS HOLISTIC, LLC, Case No. 23-cv-00753-AMO (LJC) 8 Plaintiff, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 9 v. RE: MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 10 GOKUL PUDASAINI, et al., Re: ECF No. 21 Defendants. 11 12 13 Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC (GS Holistic) filed this action for alleged trademark 14 infringement under

15 U.S.C. § 1114

and false designation of origin and unfair competition under 15 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) against Defendants Gokul Pudasaini d/b/a Smoke and Vape (Smoke and 16 Vape) and Gokul Pudasaini. ECF No. 14 (First Amended Complaint,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Susan Kanter Sharon Plunk v. Warner-Lambert Co. And Pfizer Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Pepsico, Inc. v. California Security CansDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API