Windsor Securities, Inc. v. Hartford Life Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SCIRICA, Circuit Judge.
In this diversity case involving market timing,1 the sponsor of a mutual fund, Hartford Life Insurance Company, imposed restrictions on investors’ ability to effect transfers among fund sub-accounts through third party agents. Plaintiff Windsor Securities, Inc., an investment ad-visor to Hartford investors, alleged that Hartford’s restrictions resulted in tortious interference with its existing contracts. Plaintiff Walter Arader, an investor, alleged that Hartford’s imposition of restrictions constituted breach of contract. The district court granted…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Stephen B. Batoff, ph.d. v. State Farm Insurance Company, Leonard M. Paul, ed.dCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Aetna Business Credit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Gans, Curtis, G. v. Mundy, James F. And the Law Firm of Raynes, McCarty Binder & MundyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Jayne G. Nathanson v. The Medical College of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Adler, Barish, Daniels, Levin & Creskoff v. EpsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Windsor Securities, Inc. v. Hartford Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993