Legal Opinion
Rockwood Sprinkler Co. v. Phillips Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided February 23, 1932No. Gen. No. 34,396PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scanlan
By its amended declaration, the plaintiff, Roekwood Sprinkler Company, sued the defendant, The Phillips Company, in assumpsit. The case was tried before the court, with a jury, and there was a verdict returned for the plaintiff in the sum of $13,325. Judgment was entered on the verdict and the defendant has appealed.
The amended declaration consists of two counts; the first pleads a written contract between the plaintiff and the defendant for the installation of a sprinkler system, and alleges the installation of the system by the plaintiff and the failure of the defendant to pay for it. The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chicago City Railway Co. v. CarrollIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
- People ex rel. Chicago Bar Ass'n v. AmosIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
- Erikson v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
- The People v. McLaughlinIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
- Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. National Storage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1913
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tilt-Up Concrete, Inc. v. Star City/Federal, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Slater v. Missionary Sisters of the Sacred HeartAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- Bentley v. TetonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
- Rubottom v. Crane Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1939
- Hackler v. Cardinal Newman CollegeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.