Legal Opinion

Grobart v. North Jersey, C., Commission

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 4, 1948No. Docket 107/491PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The bill of complaint in this case was filed by Bertha Grobart who alleges that she is the owner of riparian lands situated below the Great Falls on the Passaic River. It seeks to enjoin the defendant, North Jersey District Water Supply Commission, from diverting waters from the Wanaque River, a tributary of the Passaic River. The point of diversion is the location of the works of the defendant in Wanaque at a point approximately ten miles above the complainant's premises. The complainant asks this injunction unless the defendant shall cause her rights to be condemned at law and damages fixed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Casler v. . ShipmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  2. Carlisle v. CooperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1870
  3. Johnston v. HydeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1881
  4. Mayor of Newark v. Chestnut Hill Land Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1910
  5. Davis v. BrighamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1849

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re FlaschNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  2. Panetta v. Equity One, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  3. Panetta v. Equity One, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  4. Com. v. Deweese, H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API