Chawangkul v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtBart F. Virden, Judge
liAn Arkansas County jury convicted appellant Chachawal Chawangkul1 of second-degree sexual assault involving then eight-year-old N.L., his girlfriend’s granddaughter, and he was sentenced to serve five years in prison. On appeal, appellant argues that the trial court erred in denying his directed-verdict motions because the State failed to prove that he touched the child for the purpose of sexual gratification. We affirm.
I.Standard of Review
A motion for directed verdict is a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. Davis v. State, 2009 Ark. App. 753, 2009 WL 3762749. On appeal, in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McGalliard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Holloway v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Farmer v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Castrellon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
- John Ford v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
- Tracy Will Vaughn v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
- Joseph Anthony Brehm v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
- Chawangkul v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.