Legal Opinion

Chawangkul v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 14, 2016No. CV-16-331PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBart F. Virden, Judge

liAn Arkansas County jury convicted appellant Chachawal Chawangkul1 of second-degree sexual assault involving then eight-year-old N.L., his girlfriend’s granddaughter, and he was sentenced to serve five years in prison. On appeal, appellant argues that the trial court erred in denying his directed-verdict motions because the State failed to prove that he touched the child for the purpose of sexual gratification. We affirm.

I.Standard of Review

A motion for directed verdict is a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. Davis v. State, 2009 Ark. App. 753, 2009 WL 3762749. On appeal, in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McGalliard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Holloway v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Farmer v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Castrellon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  2. John Ford v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
  3. Tracy Will Vaughn v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
  4. Joseph Anthony Brehm v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
  5. Chawangkul v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API