Legal Opinion
Gonzalez Ramos v. Adr Vantage, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 29, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2018-1690Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) JOEY D. GONZALEZ RAMOS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 18-cv-01690 (APM) ) ADR VANTAGE, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the court is a motion for sanctions filed by Defendant ADR Vantage, Inc. against Plaintiff Joey D. Gonzalez Ramos. Def.’s Renewed Mot. for Rule 11 Sanctions, ECF No. 87 [hereinafter Def.’s Mot.]. It seeks monetary sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 on the theory that Plaintiff…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Townsend v. Holman Consulting Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Rommy Revson, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant, Judd Burstein v. Cinque & Cinque, P.C., Defendant-Counterclaimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- National Association of Government Employees, Inc. v. National Federation of Federal Employees, and Maria Luisa A. InocencioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Sussman v. Bank Of IsraelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.