Heine v. Rohner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, Anton Iglauer, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 7th day of March, 1898, continuing an injunction pendente lite.
1Opinion of the Court
Van Brunt, P. J.:
This action was brought against Johannes Rohner and Anton Iglaner, to restrain them from importing into the United States or Canada any goods known as “ schiffle ” embroidery, and from selling or exhibiting for sale any of such goods.
It appears that on the 1st of July, 1897, the firm of A. B. Heine & Co., composed of Arnold B. Heine and Jacob Rohner, were doing business in the city of New York, and that the firm of Jacob Rohner & Co., composed of Jacob Rohner and the defendant Johannes Rohner, were manufacturers of embroideries in Switzerland. On that date the said two firms…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
3Cited by11 opinions
- Goldman v. CornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Huntington v. Cortland Home Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Glascoe v. WillardNew York Supreme Court · 1904
- Hudson Valley Railway Co. v. O'ConnorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Heine v. RohnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.