Legal Opinion
Garrett v. State Ex Rel. Matthews
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 10, 1938No. 7 Div. 426PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
A bill filed to abate a liquor nuisance under Code, § 4671, is sufficiently verified by affidavit of the relator, a deputy solicitor, deposing that he “has probable cause to believe and does believe that the allegations” of the bill are tfue. Code, § 4672; In re State ex rel. Attorney General, 179 Ala. 639, 60 So. 285.
The bill by proper' allegations charges respondent with the maintenance of a liquor nuisance as defined in Code, § 4619; Fulton v. State, 171 Ala. 572, 54 So. 688.
The evidence sustained the charge and the decree enjoining the continuance of such nuisance,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ex Parte HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Fulton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- In re State ex rel. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
3Cited by15 opinions
- Keating v. State Ex Rel. AusebelSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
- Trans-Lux Corp. v. State Ex Rel. SweetonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Espey v. State ex rel. NicolSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Grace v. Birmingham Trust & Savings Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- Blakely v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.