Legal Opinion

Compaq Computer Corp. v. Ergonome Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 5, 2004No. 01-20861PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge:

This case arises from Ergonome’s claim that Compaq’s Safety and Comfort Guide (“SCG”) unlawfully infringed on a copyright held by Ergonome in Preventing Computer Injury: The HAND Book (“THB”), a teaching text describing ergonomically correct hand positions for computer users and ways to avoid repetitive stress injuries. On July 11, 2001, after a seven-day trial, the jury concluded that any copying by Compaq was de minimis and constituted fair use according to 17 U.S.C. § 107. The district court subsequently held that the doctrines of laches and equitable estoppel…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. John D. Dupree v. Warden, Attorney General, State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
  2. Brazos River Authority v. GE Ionics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  3. Paz v. Brush Engineered Materials, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  4. Law Funder, L.L.C. v. Sergio Munoz, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  5. DeCorte v. JordanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API