Legal Opinion
Threadgill v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided June 19, 1944No. 4355PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcFaddin, J.
Appellant was convicted of cattle stealing in violation of the provisions of § 3129' of Pope’s Digest; and lias brought'this appeal.
Four informations were filed against appellant in the trial court, and we refer to these informations by the respective number used in the trial court:
No. 1491 was for stealing a steer, the property of Guy Harris.
No. 1492 was for stealing a heifer: i£The property of J >
No. 1493 was for stealing a steer, the property of J. Y. Standridge.
No. 1494 was for stealing a heifer; the property of J. D. Nichols.
Information No. 1492 was quashed by the court. By consent, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rayburn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1901
- Tiner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- Ware v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
- Fogel v. ButlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Bodcaw Lumber Co. v. FordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Thom v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Renfro v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950