Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Woodruff-Dunlap Printing Co. v. Bartley

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1897No. 8948PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Original application for mandamus to require the state printing board to award to tbe relator tbe contract to print and bind tbe reports of state officers, and other reports.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

An act of 1883, Session Laws, chapter 61, Compiled Statutes, chapter 68, provides for printing for the state. The auditor of public accounts, treasurer, and secretary of state are constituted a state printing board and given general supervision over the matter of state printing, in the manner provided by the act. The act provides that the board shall advertise at certain times, and in a certain manner, for proposals for the different classes of printing provided for. It is required that the advertisement shall state that the board reserves the right to reject any and all bids (sec.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. First National Bank v. CookNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. State ex rel. Hymer v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
  3. State ex rel. Mitchell v. School District number nineNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
  4. State ex rel. Beatty v. Mayor of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  5. State ex rel. Gillilan v. Home Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Long v. BarstlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  2. State ex rel. Cronin v. CroninNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. State ex rel. CarrNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  4. State ex rel. J. L. Brandeis & Sons v. MelcherNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Gutschow v. RamserNebraska Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API