McKinney v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The case as considered on the appeal is sufficiently stated in the opinion. Defendant made a motion .for continuance; motion for new trial based upon the refusal of a continuance; motion to retax the ■costs, and a motion in arrest of judgment,' all of which were overruled and exceptions duly reserved.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSObT, Presiding Judge.
Conviction for disturbing religious worship. On a former appeal, the judgment was reversed on account of a variance between the information and complaint, and the county attorney was ordered to file a new information. McKinney v. State (Texas Criminal Appeals), 49 S. W. Rep., 376. This, it appears, was done, and the trial was had under the new pleading. Appellant was not rearrested, but voluntarily answered. He moved for continuance because of the absence of various witnesses. The State Telied upon evidence showing appellant disturbed several persons in a church…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fielder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lackey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Rankin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909