United States v. Mark Arden Schmucker
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MILBURN, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant Mark Arden Schmucker appeals his conviction for willfully failing to register with the Selective Service System in violation of 50 U.S.C. App. §§ 453, 462. Defendant’s principal arguments are that requiring him to register impermissibly burdened his rights under the free exercise clause of the First Amendment, and that he was entitled to discovery and an evidentiary hearing on his claim that he was selectively prosecuted on the basis of his religious beliefs. Finding defendant’s arguments without merit, we affirm.
I. FACTS
President Carter initiated…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Johnson v. RobisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Gillette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. Ricky PeeteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Rodney BourgeoisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Alayne B. Adams (87-5388), Mayo L. Coiner (87-5424)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. WalkerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1995
- United States v. BradleyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.