State ex rel. McIndoe v. Blair
Supreme Court of Missouri
Prohibition. (1) Hhe claims of the Independent Powder Company and the Joplin Supply Company are founded upon an account against the Florence Mining Company, a corporation. The indebtedness claimed is not a direct charge against the defendant, Arthur Kennedy. The petition seeks to charge Kennedy on a personal obligation to the company and to the Joplin Supply Company and Independent Powder Company.
Read the full summary
Prohibition. (1) Hhe claims of the Independent Powder Company and the Joplin Supply Company are founded upon an account against the Florence Mining Company, a corporation. The indebtedness claimed is not a direct charge against the defendant, Arthur Kennedy. The petition seeks to charge Kennedy on a personal obligation to the company and to the Joplin Supply Company and Independent Powder Company. It involves personal rights and obligations and a judicial determination of the rights of the Independent Powder Company and of the liability of the defendant, Arthur Kennedy, to the corporation. It…
1Opinion of the CourtWoodson, J.
This is an original proceeding instituted in this court, seeking to prohibit the circuit court of Jasper county from further proceeding with the trial of two certain causes pending therein, namely: The Independent Powder Company v. Arthur Kennedy, and The Joplin Supply Company v. Arthur Kennedy. Both involve the same issues in fact and propositions of law.
In order to correctly understand the questions here presented, it will only be necessary to set out the return of the respondent, and the report of the special commissioners appointed by this court to hear the evidence, etc. The petition for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Freeman v. AldersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Wilson v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Fitzsimmons v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
- Ellison v. MartinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Auchincloss, Parker & Redpath, Inc. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
- Chapman v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
- Turnbow ex rel. Turnbow v. Kansas City Railways Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1919
- German v. Universal Oil Products Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1934
- Elvins v. ElvinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.