Legal Opinion
Clary v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 23, 2016No. 16-168PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
I,Michael Cal Clary and Catherine Ann Hixson Clary brought suit against a number of defendants to recover damages they claim to have suffered while acquiring and operating an insurance agency in Lees-ville, Vernon Parish, Louisiana. The Clar-ys asserted causes of action against all of the defendants in the litigation under a number of theories of recovery, and the various defendants filed two separate peremptory exceptions of no cause of action seeking only the dismissal of the damage claims arising pursuant to the Louisiana Antitrust Statute, La.R.S. 51:122 (the antitrust statute), and the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Industrial Companies, Inc. v. DurbinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- John River Cartage, Inc. v. Louisiana Generating, LLC, NRG Energy, Inc. and Headwaters Resources, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2020
- Michael Cal Clary and Catherine Ann Hixon Clary v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Sheila Broussard Guidry v. Ave Maria Rosary & Cenacle, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2022