Legal Opinion

State v. Calderon-Aparicio

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 29, 2010No. 101,299PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Green, J.:

Ruben Calderon-Aparicio appeals from his jury trial convictions for possession of marijuana with intent to sell, distribute, or deliver and no tax stamp. First, Calderon-Aparicio argues that there was insufficient evidence to prove that the crimes occurred in Johnson County. Nevertheless, after looking at the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, we determine that there was sufficient evidence for a rational factfinder to find beyond a reasonable doubt that the crimes occurred in Johnson County. Next, Calderon-Aparicio maintains that the eyewitness show-up…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. State v. SchoonoverSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  3. State v. RichmondSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  4. State v. TrautloffSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  5. State v. DukesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CastleberryCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2013
  2. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
  3. State v. CALDERON-APARICIOSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  4. State v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  5. State v. MaierCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API