Legal Opinion

State v. Peele

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 1, 2016No. 15-480PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, Judge.

*160 Where the State failed to meet the requirements of Rule 9(b), and where the State's evidence was insufficient to confer subject matter jurisdiction upon the trial court for the revocation of defendant's probation in Case Nos. 11 CRS 543-45, we vacate the judgments imposed in those cases. In Case Nos. 12 CRS 1214-19, we remand to the trial court for correction of clerical errors.

On 13 January 2009, defendant Martin Luther Peele was indicted for two counts of obtaining property by false pretenses in violation of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14100 , a Class H felony. On 6 April 2009,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. FelmetSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. State v. PetersilieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  4. State v. JarmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. State v. WebberCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  2. State v. CraigCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  3. State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  4. State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API