Ivester v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
1. (a) An indictment can properly contain a count for burglary and one for receiving stolen goods knowing them to be stolen, when the articles were knowingly received from the person who committed the burglary and were taken from the store at the time it was burglarized.(b) An indictment so alleging and at the same time alleging that the principal was unknown to the grand jury is not subject to demurrer on the ground of misjoinder of the offenses of burglary and receiving stolen goods, knowing them to be the fruit of the burglary from the person committing the same. See Benford v. State, 39…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gilbert v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
- Webb v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Suggs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Webb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Belton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- Quarles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Wingfield v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Bowen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.