English v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
KELSEY, Judge.
The trial court found Jermaine Antoine English guilty of maliciously causing bodily injury in violation of Code § 18.2-51. On appeal, English challenges the sufficiency of the evidence offered to convict him of this offense. We find the evidence sufficient and affirm his conviction.
I
On appeal, we review the evidence in the “light most favorable” to the Commonwealth. Commonwealth v. Hudson, 265 Va. 505, 514, 578 S.E.2d 781, 786 (2003). This principle requires us to “discard the evidence of the accused in conflict with that of the Commonwealth, and regard as true all the credible…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Commonwealth v. HudsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
- Parks v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
- Bolden v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008
- Perry v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Perkins (ORDER)Supreme Court of Virginia · 2018
- Ricks v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2015
- Marcantonio v. DudzinskiDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2015
- Eric William Wandemberg v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2019
- Robert Wayne Dawson, II v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.