Legal Opinion

Durisek v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided November 28, 1967No. C 65-27PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLambros, J.

This action was instituted on January 18, 1965, by George Durisek, plaintiff herein, seeking damages *48from the defendant, Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation (hereinafter referred to as J & L) for personal injuries allegedly suffered by him as a result of the negligence of J & L’s employees. On April 19, 1967, J & L entered a motion pursuant to Bule 14 for leave to file a third-party complaint naming the Buckeye Union Casualty Company (hereinafter referred to as Buckeye) as the third-party defendant. Buie 14(a) provides in part:

“At any time after commencement of the action a defendant, as a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Buckeye Union Casualty Co. v. Illinois National Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kurdziel v. Pittsburgh Tube Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  2. Helen T. Kurdziel, of the Estate of Franklin C. Rosebrock, Deceased v. Pittsburgh Tube Company, Third-Party v. Travelers Insurance Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API