Legal Opinion

Brigmon v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 21, 1960No. [P.C. No. 41, September Term, 1959.]PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, J.

In his application for relief under the Uniform Post Conviction Procedure Act, the petitioner set forth thirteen alleged reasons as to why he was entitled to such relief. The learned trial judge, after hearing in open court, ordered “that the petitioner’s petition * * * be denied for the reasons that all of the alleged errors * * * are such that should and could have been raised by an appeal and not by procedure under the Post Conviction Procedure Act. * * * And it is further found that the defendant * * * was not deprived of any federal rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wampler v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  2. Whitley v. Warden of Maryland House of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. Ellinger v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  4. Slack v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  5. Cook v. Warden of the Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API