Legal Opinion

State v. Dale

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 13, 1938No. 44319PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

— There is ample evidence to sustain the verdict. Appellant seeks reversal because of alleged misconduct of counsel for the state in his closing argument to the jury and on the failure of the court to instruct the jury as to defendant’s theory of the ease.

On the afternoon of August 31, 1937, some men were engaged in flushing a storm sewer at an intersection of two streets in the city of Missouri Valley, Iowa. While so engaged, the defendant came along in his car and ran over them. He proceeded on down the street about a hundred feet before bringing his car to a stop. Two persons, who were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. KendallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  2. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  3. State v. BurnsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  4. State v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. State v. McKinnonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HaffaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
  2. State v. HarlessSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  3. State v. PerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
  4. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  5. State v. CoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API