Legal Opinion

Smith v. Andrew

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 21, 1929No. 39958PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

The defendant is the superintendent of banking, and as such is the receiver of the Farmers State Bank of Lake Mills, which went into receivership on December 25, 1927. ' The plaintiff was one of its stockholders, holding 15 shares of stock. On March 28, 1928, the defendant-receiver obtained a judgment against this plaintiff, predicated upon his double liability as stockholder, under Section 9251, Code, 1927. An execution having been issued under the judgment, and returned nulla bona, the defendant was proceeding to levy upon the plaintiff’s homestead. The plaintiff took by inheritance from…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Richmond v. IronsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Bernheimer v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Elson v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. Hirning v. HamlinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  5. Anderson v. KyleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Preston v. HowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  2. In Re the Marriage of McMorrowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  3. Andrew v. First Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  4. Hunt, Hill & Betts v. MooreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  5. Richison v. State Ex Rel. BarnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API