Joyner v. Dumas Arkansas, City of

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS DELTA DIVISION ROSCOE JOYNER and JOYNER CONSTRUCTION LLC PLAINTIFFS v. No. 2:22-cv-62-DPM CITY OF DUMAS, ARKANSAS DEFENDANT ORDER The Court appreciates the parties’ briefs on the Rule 17 issues. Joyner has confirmed that Joyner Construction, LLC doesn’t exist. His bid was from “Joyner Construction.” And he meant to name as co-plaintiff “Joyner Construction Company” —a sole proprietorship. Neither Joyner Construction nor Joyner Construction Company has a separate legal identity from Joyner. Shamlin v. Quadrangle Enterprises,…