Legal Opinion · Dissent

T.E.C. v. Limestone County Department of Human Resources

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 3, 1998No. 2961071Published

1DissentCrawley, Judge

I must respectfully dissent. The father’s March 19, 1996, appeal from the juvenile court to the circuit court was premature because it was not taken from a final judgment. See Wingard v. Wingard, 625 So.2d 441, 442 (Ma.Civ.App.1993). The circuit court had no authority to hold the father’s premature appeal “in abeyance” until a final order was entered by the juvenile court. See Ex parte City of Irondale, 686 So.2d 1127, 1130 (Cook, J., concurring specially) (stating that Rule 4(a)(5), Aa. R.App. P., which allows for holding an appeal in abeyance, applies only to appeals to the Supreme Court,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte City of IrondaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  2. Wingard v. WingardCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API