Brookes v. Chesley
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from Prince George’s county court. This was an action of Assumpsit brought on the 14th November 1S43, by the appellant against the appellee. With the declaration the plaintiff filed an account of goods sold and delivered. Issues were joined on the pleas of non assumpsit, and limitations.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Prince George’s county court. This was an action of Assumpsit brought on the 14th November 1S43, by the appellant against the appellee. With the declaration the plaintiff filed an account of goods sold and delivered. Issues were joined on the pleas of non assumpsit, and limitations. In the trial of this cause the plaintiff offered in evidence to the jury, the account declared on in the present action, and then proved to the jury by a competent witness, that shortly before the institution of the present suit, which was in March 1843, he, the witness, had a conversation with the…
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
This is an action of assumpsit, instituted in Prince George’s county court. The defendant pleaded non assumpsit, and the statute of limitations, (actio non accrevil,) to the counts in the nar.
The bill of exceptions states : — ■“ In the trial of this cause the plaintiff to maintain the issues on his part joined, offered in evidence to the jury the account declared on in the present action; and then proved to the jury, by a competent witness, that shortly before the institution of the present suit, which was in March 1843, he, the witness, had a conversation with the defendant, respecting the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Oliver v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1827
- Keplinger v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1830
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mitchell v. SellmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
- Stockett v. SasscerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
- Knight v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928