Legal Opinion
In re the Final Accounting of Biggars
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided December 15, 1902PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Proceedings upon the final accounting of an executrix.
1Opinion of the Court
Hoysradt, S.
The legatees under the will of Catharine Werner have filed objections to the account of the executrix claiming that she should not be credited with an item of $500, alleged to he due her from the testatrix, nor with $115 for personal expenses, and that she should be charged with $2,286.34, which was deposited in the Poughkeepsie Savings Bank in the name of “ Catharine Wemer, in trust for Katie Hydrant.”
The executrix is at various places in the record referred to as Katie Werner, Hydrant, Williams and Biggars.
Catharine Werner, who had for many years been a widow, died January 25,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Beaver v. . BeaverNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Martin v. . FunkNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Mabie v. . BaileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Cunningham v. . DavenportNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Willis v. . SmythNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brucks v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Dickie v. AdamsNew York Supreme Court · 1903
- In re the Estate of SmithNew York Surrogate's Court · 1903