AT & T Technologies, Inc. v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.
The sole issue is whether former R.C. 4123.56 mandates that where an attending physician’s report supports TTD, a self-insured employer must continue payment until a district hearing officer orders that TTD be terminated. For the following reasons, we affirm the court of appeals’ holding that payment of TTD must continue until a district hearing officer orders that it be terminated.
Under former R.C. 4123.56, a self-insured employer must continue payment of TTD until one of three events occurs: (1) the employee has returned to work; (2) the employee’s attending…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State ex rel. Ramirez v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- State ex rel. Jeep Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
3Cited by8 opinions
- State ex rel. Russell v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Russell v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. MTD Products, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Dillon v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State ex rel. MTD Products, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.