Legal Opinion

AT & T Technologies, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1993No. 92-1403PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

The sole issue is whether former R.C. 4123.56 mandates that where an attending physician’s report supports TTD, a self-insured employer must continue payment until a district hearing officer orders that TTD be terminated. For the following reasons, we affirm the court of appeals’ holding that payment of TTD must continue until a district hearing officer orders that it be terminated.

Under former R.C. 4123.56, a self-insured employer must continue payment of TTD until one of three events occurs: (1) the employee has returned to work; (2) the employee’s attending…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ramirez v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State ex rel. Jeep Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Russell v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Russell v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. MTD Products, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Dillon v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. State ex rel. MTD Products, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API