Lowe v. . Harris
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BURWELL, J., dissents arguendo, in which CLARK, J., concurs. The extreme limit of liberality in sanctioning the admission of parol proof to explain ambiguous descriptions in deeds and contracts for the sale and conveyance of land was attained in Carson v. Ray, 52 N.C. 609, where the premises were described as "my house and lot in the town of Jefferson," and the plaintiff was permitted to show that the grantor had but one house and lot within the boundaries of that place. In discussing that case and distinguishing it from Murdock v. Anderson, 57 N.C. 77, Battle, J., delivering the opinion of…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- Wilkinson v. LelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- TERRETT & OTHERS v. Taylor & OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
- Dash v. Van KleeckNew York Supreme Court · 1811
- Hoke v. . HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1833
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bateman v. . SterrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Hazzard v. AlexanderSuperior Court of Delaware · 1934
- Scilley v. Red Lodge-Rosebud Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- Hicks v. . KearneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Booth v. . HairstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.