Legal Opinion

Gaffers-Hinman Coal Co. v. Wessel

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1928Published

1Opinion of the CourtGoldsmith, J.

The Statute of Frauds is interposed to recovery in this action. The defendant denies that there has been delivery and acceptance as required by section 85 of the Personal Property Law to constitute an enforcible oral contract.

During the winter of 1926 a strike in the coal mines of Pennsylvania created an increased demand for coke. The plaintiff and the defendant were coal dealers in the city of Schenectady and the plaintiff had been supplying coke in carload lots to the defendant. The plaintiff procured the coke from the Keystone Coal and Coke *908Company of Philadelphia, which made shipments…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Borenco Importing Corp. v. SperberAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API