Legal Opinion

Potter v. Neal

New York County Court, Montgomery County

Decided November 15, 1880PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion for a new trial on the minutes. Action in trover for the conversion of an undivided one-half of a quantity of cattle.

1Opinion of the Court

Zerah S. Westbrook, County Judge.

— Defendant’s motion at the opening of the trial to dismiss the complaint, on the ground that it does not show that the court has jurisdiction, by alleging that the defendant is a resident of the county, was properly denied.

He answered .to the merits, noticed the cause for trial twice (and for the present term), and had it put over a former term for an absent witness. The objection therefore came too late.- It was not taken either by demurrer or answer. The defect, if any, was waived. There would be some force in the objection if the complaint showed that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bullock v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Ripley v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Swartwout v. EvansIllinois Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ross v. KonorNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Vogel v. BanksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  3. Heenan v. New York, West Shore & Buffalo Railway Co., New York County Courts1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API