Legal Opinion

State v. Pemberton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 7, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShain, P. J.

In this proceeding Article 13, Revised Statutes of Missouri, 1939, is involved. The subject-matter of aforesaid article is “Dogs.”

In Section 14555 of the article, the term “dog” is defined as follows:

“See. 1455. Word ‘dog’ defined. The word ‘dog’ whenever used in this article without qualifications, is intended to mean a female as well as a male dog over six months of age. (R. S. 1929, sec. 12878).”

In onr judicial consideration we must adhere to the legislative definition. Missourians, by reason of sentimental folk poetry and song, generally attribute to the term “dog” the appellation “hound.”

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robbins v. Bangor Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  3. State ex rel. Rippee v. ForestMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kansas City v. WilhoitMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Walker Reorganized School District R-4 v. FlintMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. Kelley v. WaymeyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  4. Spivack v. SpivackMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. State ex rel. Foster v. PriceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API