Legal Opinion

Beech v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 1998No. 49A05-9802-PC-90PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Edward Beech appeals from the denial of his Successive Petition for Post-Conviction Relief and his Motion to Correct Erroneous Sentence.

We reverse and remand with instructions to dismiss.

ISSUES

The parties present several issues for review, which we restate as:

1. Whether the trial court improperly entertained jurisdiction over Beech’s successive petition for post-conviction relief.

2. Whether the trial court erred when it denied Beech’s motion to correct erroneous sentence.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In August of 1983, Beech was charged with Rape as a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Ross v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Harshman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Butler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Reffett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Benson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Jennings v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Mabbitt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Bryan P. Stone v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Eddie G. Love v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API