Setzer v. Setzer.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
ActioN by Henry T. Setzer against Laura A. Setzer, beard by Judge Fredericlc Moore and a jury, at August Term, 1900, of Catawba County Superior Court. From a decree of divorce a mensa et flioro, instead of a vinculo, as prayed, tbe plaintiff appealed. ■
1Opinion of the CourtCooK, J.
Tbe object of tbis suit is to dissolve tbe bond of matrimony existing between tbe plaintiff and defendant.
Upon tbe finding by tbe jury of tbe issues, bis Honor granted a decree of divorce a mensa et thoro, to' wbicb tbe plaintiff excepted. Tbe question thus presented for our decision is, wbetber bis Honor erred in not granting a decree of divorce a vinculo matrimonii, as prayed for.
Tbe relief sought is based upon tbe ground of abandonment, under sec. 1285 of Tbe Code, as amended by chapter 277, Acts of 1895, and chapter 211, Acts of 1899.
Tbe issues as found establish tbe marriage, residence,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- High v. . BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Whittington v. . WhittingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1836
- Foy v. . FoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1851
3Cited by10 opinions
- Caddell v. CaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Page v. . PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Sanderson v. . SandersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Setzer v. Setzer.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.