Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Claim of Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 18, 1963Published

1DissentReynolds, J.

It is my view that under the facts of this case the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant left her employment without good cause within the meaning of section 593 (subd. 1, par. [a]) of the Unemployment Insurance Law (Labor Law, art. 18) was eminently correct. At the outset, the statement of facts as set forth in the majority opinion should be clarified. The claimant quit her job on August 30, 1961 and thereafter filed a claim for unemployment benefits on the ground that she was laid off because work was slow. This was not only found to be a willful false statement…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of Mutual Benevolent Society of 1865, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
  2. In re Claim of PillersdorfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  3. In re the Claim of MarcusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API