Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Serstock

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 10, 1986No. C3-86-264Published

1DissentSedgwick, Judge

I respectfully dissent. The questions before us are essentially (1) Does Minn.Stat. § 609.43(2) embrace conduct other than that specifically prohibited by statute? and (2) May violations of a city’s ethics manual, incorporating ethical codes of a lawyer’s professional responsibility, be the source of a claim that a prosecutor exceeded lawful authority and committed misconduct? I would answer both questions in the affirmative.

In dismissing the indictments for failure to state an offense, the trial court stated that only the legislature can declare specific conduct criminal offenses and that…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. BramblettSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  4. Independent Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. State v. WeleckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API