Legal Opinion

Herbert Brownell, Jr. v. Chase National Bank

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 19, 1956No. 24PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

The question in the case is whether petitioner, by virtue of a vesting order issued under § 5 of the Trading with the Enemy Act, as amended, 40 Stat. 411, 50 U. S. C. App. § 5, is entitled to the res of a trust established in 1928 by one Cobb and administered by respondent under an indenture. The trust was created for the benefit of the descendants of Bruno Reinicke who, by reason of his powers over the trust and his ownership of the right of reversion, was the real settlor.

In 1945, when this Nation was at war with Germany, the Alien Property Custodian issued an order vesting “all right,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Tait v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Young v. Higbee Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Chase National Bank v. McGrathNew York Court of Appeals · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Independent Petroleum Workers of America, Inc. v. American Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
  2. United States v. Rangel-PerezDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1959
  3. People v. De Sisto, New York County Courts1961
  4. Slifka v. JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API