Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of O'Hara

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 15, 1906PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Objections to the report of J ames J. Barren, referee.

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas, S.

The referee properly determined that the items in the account for moneys paid by the administrator for legal services rendered to him in the course of administration, having-been duly objected to, the burden rested upon the accountant to establish affirmatively, by common-law evidence, the necessity for such services and their value, and that, in the absence of" *426such evidence, they must be disallowed. Matter of Hosford, 27 App. Div. 427, 433; Matter of Peck, 79 id. 296; affd., 177 N. Y. 538; Journault v. Ferris, 2 Dem. 320, 325; Matter of Riley, 4 id. 333. The attorney, who is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of HosfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. In Re the Accounting of PeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1903

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Intermediate Judicial Settlement of Account of Proceedings of WendelNew York Surrogate's Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API