Houghton v. Ault
New York Supreme Court
Motion to discharge order of attachment.
1Opinion of the Court
James, Justice.
It is conceded that the facts set forth in plaintiff’s affidavit are sufficient to warrant the issuing of the order of attachment; it showed the indebtedness of the defendant upon contract, the amount due, and stated that he was not a resident of the state, but resided in Kingston, Canada West.
The defendant now moves, before the officer who granted the order, to vacate the same, and offers to read counter affidavits in support of his motion. The plaintiff objects to such affidavits being received.
Previous to the last amendment of the Code, there was considerable conflict of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Frost & Dickinson v. BrisbinNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- In re ThompsonNew York Supreme Court · 1828
- In re WrigleyCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1831
- In re WrigleyNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- Jackson v. RogersNew York Supreme Court · 1796
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Elton Leather Corp. v. First General Resources Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. SchoonmakerNew York Supreme Court · 1871
- Zebert v. HuntU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1901
- Floyd v. BlakeNew York Supreme Court · 1860
- Pantheon Properties, Inc. v. HoustonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022