Grantham v. Bulik
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
This is an action to recover for injuries claimed to have been caused by the negligent operation of the defendants’ automobile on February 5, 1949. The finding, which is not subject to correction, can be summarized as follows: The plaintiffs were, respectively, driver and passenger in an automobile proceeding in an easterly direction on route 15 in the town of Vernon. The defendant Michael Bulik, hereinafter called the defendant, was driving westerly in an automobile owned by the defendant John Bulik. The highway, a two-lane concrete road with oiled macadam shoulders, was substantially level…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- James v. Von SchuckmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Martin v. HolwaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Giancarlo v. KarabanowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Baum v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Trask v. New Haven Shore Line Railway CompanySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lowell v. DalySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Amato v. SawickiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Danehy v. MetzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- O'Briskie v. BerryConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. OuelletteConnecticut Superior Court · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.