Legal Opinion

Erie County Retirees Ass'n v. County of Erie

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 23, 2001No. CIV. A. 98-272 EriePublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.

Presently pending is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Add Class Members [Doc. No. 65]. For the reasons set forth below, this motion will be denied.

Plaintiffs in this action are Medicare-eligible retirees of Erie County, Pennsylvania. They commenced this action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act *226(“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., alleging discrimination on the basis that their County-provided health care coverage was inferior to the coverage offered to non-Medicare-eligible retirees and have prevailed on the issue of liability. See Erie…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Erie County Retirees Ass'n v. County of ErieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. Sperling v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. Erie County v. Erie County Retirees Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. ERIE COUNTY RETIREES v. County of Erie, Penn.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Erie County Retirees Ass'n v. County of Erie, Pa.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Erie County Retirees Ass'n v. County of Erie, Pa.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API