Erie County Retirees Ass'n v. County of Erie
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
Presently pending is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Add Class Members [Doc. No. 65]. For the reasons set forth below, this motion will be denied.
Plaintiffs in this action are Medicare-eligible retirees of Erie County, Pennsylvania. They commenced this action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act *226(“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., alleging discrimination on the basis that their County-provided health care coverage was inferior to the coverage offered to non-Medicare-eligible retirees and have prevailed on the issue of liability. See Erie…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Erie County Retirees Ass'n v. County of ErieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Sperling v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Erie County v. Erie County Retirees Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- ERIE COUNTY RETIREES v. County of Erie, Penn.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Erie County Retirees Ass'n v. County of Erie, Pa.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Erie County Retirees Ass'n v. County of Erie, Pa.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2002