Legal Opinion
State v. Duggins
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 11, 1993No. 29094-1-IPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtForrest, J.
Demeco Martinez Duggins, a juvenile, appeals his conviction of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance. Duggins contends that his conviction must be vacated and the case dismissed solely because the trial court granted a 2-day continuance when the police officer was unavailable on the date of the fact-finding hearing. 1 We disagree and affirm.
On May 24, 1991, Duggins was charged in juvenile court with one count of possession of a controlled substance (cocaine) with intent to deliver.
The hearing was originally scheduled for August 7, 1991. On that day, the State moved for a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. GuloyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. TerrovonaWashington Supreme Court · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. MichielliWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. KoerberCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- State v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- State v. ChichesterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.