Wenzel v. Palmetto Brewing Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Benet, J., Charleston, Action by Theodore Wenzel and John W. Burmester against Palmetto Brewing Company, J. H. Doscher, Security Savings Bank, and the De Fa Vergne Refrigerating Machine Company.
Read the full summary
Before Benet, J., Charleston, Action by Theodore Wenzel and John W. Burmester against Palmetto Brewing Company, J. H. Doscher, Security Savings Bank, and the De Fa Vergne Refrigerating Machine Company. From an order granting an inspection of the books of the brewing company, and a receiver therefor, the Brewing Company appeals. cite: As to the right of a stockholder to maintain this action: 39 S. C., 44; 104 U. S., 450; 98 Ala., 219. The omission of directorsfatal defect of parties defendant: 91 Mo., 271 (4 S. W. R., 79); 14 Fed. Rep., 507; 127 U. S., 489; 16 Wall., 446; 17 How., 140; 43 S.…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Jones.
In this case there are two appeals, one from an order dated January 4th, 1896, directing the Palmetto Brewing Company to deposit certain books of the company with the clerk of the court for Charleston County; the other from an order appointing a receiver of said company, dated January 13th, 1896. The action was com*82menced December 31,1895, by the plaintiffs, two stockholders of the Palmetto Brewing Company, holding nineteen of the 2,000 shares of stock of said company, against the company, its president, J. H. Doscher, and certain…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
3Cited by7 opinions
- Browne v. HammettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Equitable Trust Co. v. Columbia National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
- Gary v. MatthewsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
- Sigwald v. City BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
- Holmes v. JewettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.