Legal Opinion
Anrig v. Ringsby United
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 13, 1978No. 77-1202PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRANT, District Judge:
This appeal involves procedural issues arising from an attempt by a group of multi-state plaintiffs to bring suit against corporate and individual defendants of varied residences. The court below dismissed the entire action for lack of venue and plaintiffs now appeal that dismissal.
The underlying dispute concerns numerous lease agreements whereby the individual sets of plaintiffs (usually married couples) agreed to lease trucking equipment, consisting of tractor and trailer units, from the defendants. The terms of the agreements are not relevant to this appeal but…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Camp v. GressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Frank Sabolsky v. Michael Budzanoski Appeal of Louis A. AntalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Occidental Petroleum Corp. v. Buttes Gas & Oil Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1971
- Giusti v. Pyrotechnic Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- Kroese v. General Steel Castings CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- H. M. Greenspun v. Del E. Webb Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- King v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Eaby v. RichmondDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- King v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Walsh v. CenteioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.