Legal Opinion

Carr v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 28, 1896No. 1044PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The opinion sufficiently states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of forging a cost bond, by signing the name of Rod Baukham to the same. The indictment contains two counts. The first count charges forgery, and the second, uttering and passing the said forged bond. Both issues were submitted to the jury, and a" general verdict was returned, finding appellant guilty. It is contended that an election should have been made by the State, and that, in the absence of such election, a judgment could not be rendered upon either count. In support of this contention, we are cited to the case of Parks v. State, 29 Tex. Crim.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crawford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1892

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Banks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Wimberley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Blackwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
  4. Lovejoy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
  5. Abernathy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API