Legal Opinion

Danbury National Bank v. Caine

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

Decided November 8, 1955No. File No. 57130Published

1Opinion of the CourtFitzGerald, J.

The within action was instituted by attachment of personal property of the defendant on May 21, 1952, as per officer’s return on file. The complaint sets forth two claims for relief. One is under the statute (General Statutes § 7308) which gives a wife under prescribed circumstances indemnity from her husband for support; the other is in equity, in which a wife seeks an order for future support from her husband. It appeared at the trial on November 1, 1955, that the wife died after the commencement of suit. In view of this circumstance, the claim for future support in equity was withdrawn.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bohun v. KinaszSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  2. Churchward v. ChurchwardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
  3. Cantiello v. CantielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  4. Casale v. CasaleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  5. Kantor v. BloomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API