Legal Opinion

In Re Mata

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York

Decided April 2, 1999No. 1-19-10315PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICHAEL J. KAPLAN, Bankruptcy-Judge.

This case presents the issue of whether a husband and wife, as joint Chapter 7 debtors who have each “effected” two life insurance policies on their own lives and named their spouse as the beneficiary, may exempt the cash value of the policies under § 3212(b)(1) of N.Y. Insurance Law. 1

The facts of the case are undisputed: the Debtors claim the policies as exempt, and the Chapter 7 Trustee has objected. Briefs have been submitted. The Court finds that § 3212(b)(1) applies, is clear, and does not avail the Debtors.

DISCUSSION

This appears to be the only case…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. Modern Industrial BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Dellefield v. BlockDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
  3. Males v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. In Re RundlettDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  5. Kaufman v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wornick v. GaffneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  2. In Re LoweUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 2000
  3. In Re TrautmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 2003
  4. In Re PolanowskiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 2001
  5. In Re JacobsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API