Legal Opinion

Westervelt v. Morrelle

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided March 15, 1899Published

Appeal from an order of Special Term striking out an answer as sham and frivolous.

1Per curiam

Appeal from an order striking out an answer as sham.

The action was brought to recover rent under the terms of a written lease.

*871The answer admits the mating of the lease and alleged the cancellation and rescission thereof together with a counterclaim, of *160.

The affirmative issues thus raised cannot be stricken out as sham.

Sham issues in this connection are synonymous with false issues, and to strike them out as sham would be to dispose of the merits on a motion. Wayland v. Tysen, 45 N. Y. 281; Hiller v. Hughes, 21 How. Pr. 442; Webb v. Foster, 45 N. Y. Supr. Ct. 311; Farnsworth v. Halstead, 18…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wayland v. . TysenNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Miller v. HughesNew York Supreme Court · 1860

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API