Legal Opinion

Ridenour v. Bat Em Out

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 14, 1998PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

LANDAU, JAD.

Daniel Ridenour, an infant, by his guardian ad litem, John W. Ridenour, and John W. Ridenour, individually, (together hereinafter referred to in the singular as “plaintiff”), appeal from the award of summary judgment to defendants Bat Em Out, Rowe International, Inc. (Rowe), Barry White and Star Games, Inc. (together, “Star Games”), on plaintiff’s complaint sounding in products liability, negligent installation, and maintenance of a condition dangerous to business invitees.

In 1993, Daniel, then eleven years old, suffered a broken leg on the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  3. Butler v. Acme Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. Cintrone v. Hertz Truck Leasing & Rental ServiceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  5. Cartel Capital Corp. v. Fireco of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jerista v. MurraySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. Milanowicz v. Raymond Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
  3. Thomas v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
  4. Rocco v. NJ Transit Rail OperationsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  5. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. v. Omega Flex, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API