Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Toledo v. Sheill

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1895Published

ERROR to the Circuit Court of Lucas county.

1DissentShauck, J.

Attention is due to the terms of the statute conferring upon municipalities the power of assessment which has been exercised in these cases. It provides that “where an improvement is made of an existing street, alley or other public highway, * * the costs and expenses shall be assessed by the council on the abutting * * lots and lands in the corporation * * by the foot front of the property bounding and abutting on the improvement. ’ ’ Section 2264, Revised Statutes. The assessment contemplated is not upon buildings, but upon lots and lands. It extends to all abutting lots, whether they be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Weeks v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Morrison v. HershireSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  3. City of Lawrence v. KillamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  4. City of Des Moines v. DorrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  5. Bacon v. Mayor of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API